Oh great, now my thread has been hijacked by two meth addicts!

It's a good idea, but I've learned with this Fiero, simple is better. It would be fairly easy to install after the whole system was already installed, so unless I find I need it, I'll avoid another complication for now. To that end, I logged some OBDII data with my iPod on a trip to the S'toga DMV and back, so I have some averages. I logged IAT, Throttle Position, Coolant Temp, "Boost" and IM Pressure. I should clarify that the IM Pressure reads directly off the MAP sensor, whereas the "Boost" reading is MAP and Baro. combined. I can see why you need a 2-Bar MAP now...
Anyway:
| ECT (ºF) | TP (%) | IAT (ºF) | Boost (PSI/inHg) | IM Pressure (PSI) |
| Min | 176 | 0 (obviously) | 93.2 | -12.2 | 2.5 |
| Max | 203 | 100 (obviously ) | 152.6 | -0.05 | 14.6 |
| Avg | 188 | 8.889 | 118.5 | -8.8 | 5.9 |
| Ext. Temp: | 79ºF | | | | |
What can be gained from this? Apparently I'm a more economical driver than I thought, first off!

2, I'll obviously need a higher-pressure MAP sensor, since a 1Bar (15PSI) is somehow maxing on N/A... Someone explain that to me, please.

Also, the Max IAT was 152, which sounds high, but when compared to the average of 118, it's not so bad. But I wanted to know more. So, I did a frequency analysis.
| \/ Times IAT was less than | \/ these values: |
| 0 | 85 |
| 0 | 90 |
| 9 | 95 |
| 10 | 100 |
| 155 | 105 |
| 152 | 110 |
| 333 | 115 |
| 79 | 120 |
| 68 | 125 |
| 103 | 130 |
| 179 | 135 |
| 88 | 140 |
| 24 | 145 |
| 19 | 150 |
| 2 | 155 |
Again, what does that say? Well the majority of the time, around 50%, the IAT is between 100 and 115. That makes sense given the average. Additionally, the highest temperature reached OFTEN is 130-135, around 17% of the time. Okay, that's all well and good, but how does the temperature relate to the TP?

Ah. So the IAT spikes when my foot gets heavy. Odd, since I would expect the more air coming in, the cooler it would be, but then again, the more air, the bigger the fire. Let's see a better section view...

So the temp rises after the throttle is opened, but spikes higher when the throttle is closed after a WOT state. Presumably because the heat from the WOT can no longer be balanced with more, faster air.
What that therefore implies that the time when the charge temp will be HIGHEST is immediately after closing the throttle after a WOT state. At that point, so little is required of the engine, it might be conceivable to ignore it, since there's no load... BUT! If I were merely letting off the throttle to shift... Then the IATs would be HIGHER before I even put load on the engine for the next gear...
*This does not take into account the heat added by the S/C when the throttle is closed simply because the TB will be ahead of the S/C, so at 0% throttle, the S/c won't be heating air, having no air to heat.
Perhaps then the ideal way to set up an injection system, if required, is to have it spray at high RPM, high throttle with high RPM, and have a logic circuit for 0% throttle. IE, it would spray if I went from >80-90% straight to 0, to try to offset the heat gain, but wouldn't spray if the pre-0% were lower. That would be really easy to do via an Arduino and relay. Of course, just using a pressure switch or control from the EM would get me 2/3 of the scenarios.
This all assumes a more or less instant effect from the injection. It might be worth my while to experiment with injection while N/A, to see the immediacy of the effects, and tune the control from there.
Hmm. Looks like I talked myself into it! TBH, it's a good thing anyway, since I know our engines are knock-prone.
That's true. If the kit was designed to run sans intercooler, then he should have no problem (other than a loss of power) by cramming extra hot air into his engine, if he runs out of boost juice. I always cary extra fluids of all types in the RX-7... since you never know what you might need when it strands you on the side of the road.
Well, the kit may have been designed to run sans-IC, but it was also known for causing the deaths of quite a few EJ's, because they either ran lean or overheated. Plus, it was designed for the "dumb" (≤98) ECUs, that would just adjust to whatever you did to them. I'm not in that boat. I'm in the boat that's picky about what you use it for, and randomly scuttles itself if not satisfied.

What I would most likely do is set up a fluid level switch that gives me a light to let me know I'm low, and then a second level switch that will trigger a timing retard on the ECU. I know I'd probably be okay, but the reputation of the Rimmer kits is all to well known to not warrant SOME caution.
You know, I never thought about it... What happens when a rotary "knocks"? ...can it even be called "knocking"?
As for the fluids... It doesn't matter what car I'm driving (although they all have their own specials sauces), I always have ATF, appropriate oil, coolant (except in the VW), and typically a grease of some type. Oh, and 3 gallons of half drunk Sierra Mists.
